The net monetary services referred to as “fintech” have change into deeply embedded within the financial and social lifetime of many African nations over the previous decade.
Headlines throughout the continent usually extol fintech’s virtues. Know-how is “driving monetary inclusion” and “making life higher for individuals”. It’s serving to “customers to handle inflation”. Fintech is “too sweeping to disregard”. And, if it’s not embraced, “the nation and the complete financial system will likely be left behind”.
These headlines depict a preferred story about fintech: it’s the reply to a number of of Africa’s financial issues. This story can also be showing in coverage paperwork in nations like Uganda. Fintech is now a key element of the nation’s Nationwide Monetary Inclusion Technique 2023-2028.
Nonetheless, a counter-narrative is rising. Political economists, anthropologists and social theorists warn that fintech is an instance of an exploitative, neocolonial and racialised type of platform capitalism, a system by which a reasonably small variety of business networks revenue from consumer actions and interactions. They warning that it’s inherently anti-development. It’s, they are saying, more likely to trigger a disaster of shopper debt, emotional misery, self-harm and information piracy.
We wished to know the way the press in Africa stories on fintech. Are its failings and potential pitfalls acknowledged? Is it largely offered as a “excellent news” story?
So, in a venture we started two years in the past with South African political economist Scott Timcke, we got down to reply these questions. This sort of evaluation helps reveal how public attitudes about this new pillar of on a regular basis financial life are fashioned. It additionally reveals whether or not the press is serving as the general public’s watchdog with regard to financial issues and company affairs.
Our evaluation, the primary to have a look at how the fintech story is being informed within the African press, reveals that the protection is celebratory and gives restricted cautionary and important reporting to the general public and to policymakers. We discovered that fintech is most frequently lined with a constructive tone and as a enterprise story.
The fintech context
Worldwide and African media protection of the continent is commonly accused of fuelling adverse stereotypes, a pattern characterised as “afro-pessimism”. However previously decade, a lot of the media dialog has centered on enterprise buzz and adopted an “afro-optimism” or “Africa rising” script, because the headlines above depict.
The fintech ecology is formed by dynamics from the late 2000s. These embody the speedy uptake in broadband use and the aftermath of the 2008 monetary crash. Proponents declare that fintech will cut back poverty and inspire improvement (typically known as “leapfrogging” or “Silicon Savannah”), uplifting these unserved by formal banking. One 2016 research credited fintech with delivering a outstanding 2% poverty discount in Kenya.
Others name for a extra cautious and sceptical strategy. Critics dispute claims that fintech produces vital progressive change. Additionally they argue that fintech may be exploitative and predatory, and that it fuels inequality by additional enriching the already rich.
Learn extra:
Nigeria’s cellular cash system has a darkish facet although it is handy – new research explores the dangers
Our evaluation
Earlier analysis into the roll-out of fintech in nations throughout the continent revealed community-level techniques. “Change brokers” are deployed to recruit new prospects for cellular cash companies. “Model ambassadors” are employed to “sit in public transport and discuss” fintech merchandise.
We questioned whether or not journalists had been equally speaking up fintech or had been warning of its dangers. We analysed information protection and checked out journalism revealed between 2016 and 2021 by main newspapers in Kenya, Uganda and South Africa, in addition to by the AllAfrica information aggregator. We started with a set of 1,190 information items and analysed a pattern of 368.
Based mostly on our preliminary examination of articles, we recognized 9 themes or frames that appeared often in information protection of fintech.
The dominant body was one we labelled “announcement”: the proclamation of a brand new fintech product by the media; a celebration of innovation. “Gender inclusivity” was the least widespread body. That is the sort of reporting that focuses on a generally shared rationale for fintech: that it significantly advantages ladies and offers them new alternatives for equality and participation.
Learn extra:
What makes FinTech options succeed? We constructed a mannequin primarily based on Ghana’s expertise
We paid explicit consideration to the body we referred to as “trepidation”. We had been shocked that 61% of stories tales inside that body had a constructive total tone, regardless of the body implying potential hazard. This trepidation usually appeared because the backdrop for a information merchandise fairly than as the primary story.
These sorts of tales, we cause, permit authorities officers to advise the general public on secure monetary conduct and fintech firms to advertise the advantages of their “secure” merchandise. The recommendation contains steerage on how people can improve their consciousness of potential dangers, similar to fraud, and act with warning. This shopper schooling strategy is typical of anti-fraud measures throughout sectors.
Most tales in regards to the hazards of fintech conclude that it’s nonetheless a helpful drive and that any “hiccups” are minor. These may be soothed by state motion (similar to regulation) or particular person duty (similar to shopper schooling). General, this reinforces a story that it’s secure and logical to embed fintech in society: it’s “sanitised” by this model of stories protection.
General we concluded that the journalism within the African press we examined was largely sanitised. The tone, content material and sourcing of reporting, even within the context of well-founded fears about fintech, level to an uncritical promotion of fintech merchandise, corporations and the complete business.
Extra essential journalism wanted
The breadth of fintech’s enlargement throughout Africa and extent of potential hurt it carries – even when its critics are solely minimally right – signifies a urgent want for additional evaluation of what story is being informed. Information audiences, politicians and civil society have to demand a extra essential journalism.
